EMC Insurance

Converting an enterprise insurance underwriting platform, a mash-up of legacy designs, into a single modern business application built for stability, scalability, and clarity.

Contract UX Design Consultant, via Apex Systems

August 2024 to November 2024

  • Figma
  • LucidChart
  • Angular Material
Underwriting Workbench proposals tab with quote options ready for release
~20%
Reduction in time to quote
~15%
Revenue growth per quote
~25%
Portfolio growth, new accounts
~20%
Fewer account rejections

EMC's underwriting team was quoting business insurance on a tool that had grown into a mash-up of designs, stitched together over years, with no single source of truth for how a quote actually moved from intake to decision.

The opportunity was to convert that existing platform into a modern business application: one underwriting goal path, one visual system, built for stability and scale.

The EMC Underwriting Team had four goals for the redesign: reduce time to quote by at least 15%, increase profitability per quote by up to 15%, grow the volume of desirable new business within appetite, and reduce risk of account rejection by improving approval processes.

Every design decision after this point got weighed against those four goals directly, not against opinion or precedent.

Research started with qualitative brainstorming sessions with underwriting stakeholders, built into affinity maps in LucidChart, tagging every idea as essential, nice to have, or blue sky, then classifying it against the phase of the underwriting goal path it belonged to.

That process surfaced real performance gaps: hard stops with no clear next step, fields that were sometimes accurate and sometimes not, and entire process phases (like where Sales should plug into underwriting) that nobody had actually defined.

Digital affinity map of sticky notes classifying underwriting workflow feedback by phase, from intake through completing underwriting

The brainstorming and affinity mapping synthesized into a single "happy path" process diagram in Figma — the shared reference the whole team stayed aligned to.

Happy path process diagram tracing a quote through Policy Center, BPP, and Underwriting Central systems

The new experience was grounded in a "stepper" guiding underwriters through each phase, with a persistent left rail keeping the data they needed for that decision always visible.

Engineering had already standardized on Angular Material, so final designs used its existing component set rather than a bespoke system.

A rebuilt Underwriting Workbench: a single account view carrying underwriters through cleanse, review analysis, risk selection, rating, and quote completion, with issues, activities, and decision data all in one place instead of scattered across the old mash-up of tools.

Major trade off was not using Figma, and using Sketch instead. Sketch was legacy tool and it hung around longer than necessary.
One deviation didn't survive: an early pass repurposed the left rail as an inspector/explorer widget. It reverted to a standard navigation element after real pushback from the team's established pattern.

Time to quote dropped roughly 20%, revenue per quote grew roughly 15%, new accounts grew the portfolio by roughly 25%, and account rejections fell roughly 20%.

I left the contract before final measurements were collected, so these are conservative estimates against the team's original targets, not audited numbers.

  • Enterprise
  • Systems Design
  • Insurance